Skip to content
Lens & Lead

Ratings / Guide

How to tell if glasses are ballistic rated: a five-step check you can do at the counter

Look at the temple, find the plus, find the document number, look for the Army's logo, and read the verb. Five steps, in order, with what each one does and does not prove.

#adLens & Lead earns from qualifying Amazon purchases. Prices are set by the retailer and change. A commission never decides a ranking. How we rate · Disclosure

Revision StingerHawk
Revision StingerHawk — product photo via Amazon.

The five steps

  1. Find the stamp on the temple (and the lens).
  2. Look for the plus after Z87.
  3. Find a ballistic document number on the product page.
  4. Look for the APEL logo on the frame.
  5. Read the verb the maker uses.

Each step rules something in or out. A pair can stop at step two and be a perfectly good Z87+ range pair; it is ballistic rated only if it clears step three, and independently rated only if it clears step four.

1. Find the stamp on the temple

Every ANSI/ISEA Z87.1 protector carries the manufacturer's mark and "Z87" on the lens and on the frame, usually molded into the inside of a temple. No mark means no claim — the pair might be tough, but nobody has said so under the standard. Prescription safety frames carry "Z87-2". The full marking table is on what Z87+ means.

2. Look for the plus

"Z87+" means the lens and frame passed the high-mass and high-velocity impact tests. "Z87" alone means basic impact. On a product page the same distinction hides in the words: "Z87.1+", "Z87+" or "Z87.1 high impact" is the plus; "Z87.1" on its own is not. This is the range floor. It is not yet a ballistic rating.

3. Find a document number

A ballistic rating names a specification: MIL-PRF-32432 or 32432A (the current combined spec), MIL-PRF-31013 (the older spectacle spec) or MIL-DTL-43511 (the older goggle spec). The number will be on the maker's product page; it is rarely molded into the frame. "Ballistic", "MIL-SPEC", "military grade" and "tactical" are words, not documents. What each document requires is on MIL-PRF-32432 explained.

4. Look for the APEL logo

The U.S. Army's Authorized Protective Eyewear List is the one rating the maker did not write. Listed eyewear carries the APEL logo on the frame, and the maker sells the listed configuration as an "APEL" SKU. If you find the logo, the Army ran the MIL-PRF-32432 test on that configuration. If you do not, the pair may still be ballistic rated by the maker's statement (step three) — it is simply not on the list. Details on the APEL guide.

5. Read the verb

Makers choose their words with lawyers in the room. "APEL approved" and "certified" are claims of a recorded pass. "Meets" and "exceeds" are the maker's assertion of a pass. "Tested to" says a test happened and, on its own, nothing about the outcome. "Designed to" and "built to" say even less. Our rating column quotes the strongest statement the maker actually made, and the Magpul Defiant's card says "tested to" because that is the wording in the coverage we could read.

Read which lenses the claim covers, too. Howard Leight states its military V0 pass for the clear and amber Genesis lenses and not the vermillion. A claim belongs to the configuration tested.

Traps

  • Brand halo. Oakley, Wiley X, Gatorz, Smith and Revision all sell rated and unrated models. The rating belongs to the model.
  • Replacement lenses. The rating is for the lens in the frame it was tested in. A third-party lens in a rated frame is an untested assembly.
  • "Ballistic" in a title. One youth pair on this site has "Ballistic" in its retail title and "Z87.1 rated" in the description, with no document named. We hold it at the Z87.1 tier.
  • Sunglasses that look the part. Wraparound, dark, matte, rubber temples — none of it is a rating. See shooting glasses vs safety glasses.

Two pairs that pass every step

Both state the plus, name the document, carry an APEL listing on the page we cite, and use the strongest verbs.

Our picks for this

Five for five, on paper

  • Revision StingerHawk

    Best-documented ballistic rating

    Revision StingerHawk

    APEL9.6/10

    Z87.1-2020 clause 7.1, MIL-PRF-32432A clause 3.8.4.1, V50 807 ft/s, APEL kit.

    $119.05Amazon

    #ad · Price as of November 13, 2026 · Disclosure for the link to Revision StingerHawk

  • ESS Crossbow 2LS Kit

    Best APEL-listed kit

    ESS Crossbow 2LS Kit

    APEL9.7/10

    Z87.1+ 2015, MIL-PRF-32432A, "APEL approved" on the APEL kit page.

    $104.98Amazon

    #ad · Price as of November 13, 2026 · Disclosure for the link to ESS Crossbow 2LS Kit

Once you know how to read a marking, the next question is which makers write their claims precisely enough to be worth trusting in the first place. That comparison is on best safety glasses brands.

How Lens & Lead rates eyewear

How these picks were chosen

Every pair here is picked from the certification its maker publishes and repeats in its own wording ("meets", "certified", "tested to", "APEL"), the lens system and the tints in the box, whether the temples are described for ear muffs, and whether an Rx route exists — then scored on a public rubric that weights protection first. Every figure links to the page it came from, so you can confirm the protection before you buy. The standards themselves are explained on ANSI Z87.1 vs MIL-PRF-32432.

Scores are editorial judgments from that documented research, and the rating, the lens system and the fit are what move a pick. The rubric and its weights are published.

Questions

Frequently asked

Are shooting glasses the same as ballistic glasses?

Not necessarily. Many shooting glasses are Z87+ only. Ballistic glasses carry a maker-stated MIL-PRF-32432 (or 31013 / 43511) pass on top of it.

Where is the rating marked on the glasses?

Z87 or Z87+ is on the lens and inside a temple. The MIL-PRF document number is usually on the product page rather than the frame. The APEL logo, where present, is on the frame.

Can I trust a listing that just says 'ballistic'?

Treat it as unrated until you find a document number on the maker's page. The word alone is marketing.

Keep reading

Receipts

Sources

  1. MSC Industrial Supply — Understanding ANSI Z87.1 (high-mass 500 g from 4 ft; high-velocity steel ball at 102 mph; Z87+ and U/L/W/H/D/X markings) (checked 2026-09-21)
  2. Wikipedia — Ballistic eyewear (MIL-PRF-31013 0.15 cal T37 at 640–660 ft/s for spectacles; 0.22 cal at 550–560 ft/s for goggles; Z87 vs Z87+ marking) (checked 2026-09-21)
  3. U.S. Army — Effective Eye Protection Preserves Sight to Fight (APEL managed by PEO Soldier / MCEP; the APEL logo marks authorized eyewear) (checked 2026-09-21)
  4. Revision Military — StingerHawk Eyewear APEL U.S. Military Kit page (MIL-PRF-32432A clause 3.8.4.1, ANSI Z87.1-2020 clause 7.1, V50, EN 166, sizes, OcuMax) (checked 2026-09-21)
  5. ESS EyePro — Crossbow Black 2x w/Clear & Smoke Gray APEL page (ANSI Z87.1+ 2015, MIL-PRF-32432A, APEL) (checked 2026-09-21)
  6. Wiley X — Saber Advanced product page (ratings, frame measurements, warranty) (checked 2026-09-21)
  7. Shooting Sports USA (NRA) — New: Magpul Defiant Eyewear (Z87+, tested to MIL-PRF-32432, TR90NZZ, temple design, coatings) (checked 2026-09-21)
  8. Howard Leight Shooting Sports — Genesis Sharp-Shooter Combo Kit page (ANSI Z87.1-2010 high impact, CSA Z94.3, "Military V0" on clear/amber, Uvextreme, 3 lenses) (checked 2026-09-21)

Ratings, lens systems, fit notes and coatings come from the maker's own product pages and manuals (linked on every product), with the published safety standards behind them, and a labeled retailer or press page where the maker's own page was unavailable. Every buy button opens today's live Amazon price. Read the full method.

Back to Ratings & Standards